Un lïuns fu mut travaillez,
E de cure tut ennuiez.
En une grave fist sun lit;
Mut fu malades a sun dit.
Les bestes fist a sei venir;
Kar il voleit, ceo dist, choisir
Ki meuz purreit en bois chacer
E sa viande purchacer.
Uns e uns les mandot;
Sis ocieit e devurot -
Meuz les voleit issi manger
Que aprés cure ne travailler.

This tells of lion's weariness:
For him, the hunt was tedious.
So in a grove he made his bed;
He was quite ill, or so he said.
He bade the animals collect
Because, he said, he would select
The one best able in the wood
To hunt- and get the lion food.
He called them one by one to him;
He killed each one; devoured them -
For he preferred to eat them thus
Than run in hunts laborious.

Extract from 'Del leün malade e del gupil' ('The Sick Lion and The Fox'),
Marie de France, mid-12th century (Spiegel 1994:121)


This page provides a brief introduction to physical and conceptual predator-prey relationships in medieval European societies. This is a comparatively new topic in the field of medieval animal studies and the aim of this introduction is to inspire and provoke further discussion and research. Relevant publications are listed at the end for those interested in exploring concepts of predation in more detail.

The fundamental relationships between predators and prey, hunters and hunted were widely recognised in European societies from prehistory through to the present day. A diverse range of archaeological, written and artistics sources from the 11th-15th centuries AD indicate that the ecological realities of predation were observed in terrestrial, aerial and aquatic environments. From a modern ecological perspective humans were apex predators, and from the perspective of medieval Western Christian theology and philosophy this dominion had been ordained by God during the creation (Salisbury 1996:6-7). Aside from the management of edible domesticates, human predation reached its zenith in seigneurial hunting culture which exalted deer as the ultimate prey.

Simplified, major predator-prey relationships in medieval Europe. These are not represented as energy flows but as links from predator to prey. The purple link from humans to wild ungulates represents forms of management found in western Europe particularly from the 12th century. Predation by bears and wolves on humans was almost certainly rare, but as evidence suggests, possible.

However, human dominion was challenged physically and conceptually by other predatory animals, notably the largest terrestrial carnivores. These animals preyed on livestock and game – both groups under (variable) human management and 'protection'. In the case of game animals such as deer, it is possible that competition existed or was perceived to exist between certain groups of humans and wolves. Whilst occasional and contextually specific predation on humans cannot be ruled out (see Linnell et al. 2002), anxieties concerning the relationship between eater and eaten - animal and human - were expressed in a range of artistic and written sources, some inherited from Classical and early Christian culture, others in northern Europe from interactions between Christian and pagan cosmologies (Bynum 1995, Pluskowski 2003). The spiritual threat to the human soul was expressed in the lethal relationship between predator and prey – the devil and demonic beings appear as predatory wild animals hunting or threatening humans often represented by suitable prey animals, particularly sheep. This imagery was rooted in the Bible, where carnivores feature as both expressions of God's power:

"occurram eis quasi ursa raptis catulis et disrumpam interiora iecoris
eorum et consumam eos ibi quasi leo bestia agri scindet eos"

"I will fall upon them like a bear robbed of her cubs, I will tear open their breast, and there I will devour them like a lion, as a wild beast would rend them" (Hosea 13:8)

...and as metaphors for the demonic:

"sobrii estote vigilate quia adversarius vester diabolus
tamquam leo rugiens circuit quaerens quem devoret"

"Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, walks around like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour" (1 Peter 5:8)

Hell itself was envisaged as monstrous animal consuming and digesting the damned, although this idea did not crystallise until the 10th century (Schmidt 1995). So human dominion in medieval western thought appears to have been conditional, and the idea that people could become prey to earthly or otherworldy predators can be found in contexts ranging from the comical to the disturbing and horrific.

This tension makes the study of medieval predator-prey relationships particularly interesting and exciting - it is effectively about how people situated themselves physically and conceptually in the broader context of the natural world. The topic is also particularly relevant to modern Western society, since many hold the view that our fascination with, and fear of, impressive predators is rooted in the past, and particularly in the case of wolves, in the experiences of the Middle Ages (Kruuk 2002:69). Despite the popular status of the wolf as the most feared predator in medieval Europe, aerial and aquatic hunters also played an important role in medieval societies. The Great White Shark (depicted above) became a popular icon of predation after attacks on humans began to be regularly recorded in the 19th and 20th centuries, but in medieval societies the idea of being devoured by an impressive marine predator was a recurring motif in religious art and thought (for English examples see Schmidt 1995).

Despite the apparent links between concepts of predation in the past and present, it is essential to be aware of their specific cultural and ecological contexts. Modern responses to threatening predators are complex and range from extermination to fascination to conservation (for recent work exploring this complexity see Quammen 2004), and responses to predatory animals in medieval societies were equally diverse – using wolves and whales as metaphors for the demonic did not mean that live individuals roaming the landscapes and seascapes were envisaged as physical manifestations of the devil. With the exception of England, sustained persecution of wolves in Continental Europe and Scandinavia took place in the post-medieval period and there is no evidence that lupines or indeed any other predatory animals were hunted as a form of exorcism. However, the blurring of the boundary between human and animal was often expressed in terms of bestial violence and predation, for example amongst certain martial groups in pre-Christian Scandinavia (Price 2002).

But the nature of the evidence presents many challenges. Actual depredations were recorded relatively infrequently before the 16th century (much later in some regions) and predation is more frequently encountered in medieval contexts as a literary or iconographic motif. The relationship of these to ecological realities is far from a straightforward reflection, whilst faunal remains in medieval archaeological contexts invariably represent human rather than animal predation, although examples of the latter are occasionally identified. The study of predation and the ecological status of humans in medieval Europe therefore necessitates an interdisciplinary approach, supported by modern ecological, ethological and anthropological analogues. It is hoped this brief introduction will encourage others to explore this fascinating and continually relevant topic.



Acknowledgements

Great white shark image courtesy of Chris Fallows/apexpredators.com

Links

  • The Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe
  • Carnivore Center: The Big Five (Swedish)


  • References

  • Bynum, C.W. 1995. The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200-1336. New York.


  • Kruuk, H. 2002. Hunter and Hunted: Relationships Between Carnivores and People. Cambridge.


  • Linnell, J. D. C. Andersen, R. Andersone, Z. Balciauskas, L. Blanco, J. C. Boitani, L. Brainerd, S. Breitenmoser, U. Kojola, I., Liberg, O. Løe, J. Okarma, H. Pedersen, H. C. Promberger, C. Sand, H. Solberg, E. J. Valdmann, H. & Wabakken, P. 2002. The Fear of Wolves: a Review of Wolf Attacks on Humans. NINA Oppdragsmelding. 731. Pp. 1-65.

  • A pdf version of this document is available here

  • Pluskowski, A. G. 2003. ‘Apocalyptic monsters: animal inspirations for the iconography of medieval north European devourers’, in R. Mills and B. Bildhauer (eds.), The Monstrous Middle Ages. Cardiff.


  • Price, N. 2002. The Viking Way: Religion and War in Late Iron Age Scandinavia. Uppsala.


  • Quammen, D. 2004. Monster of God: The Man-Eating Predator in the Jungles of History and the Mind. London.


  • Schmidt, G. D. 1995. The Iconography of the Mouth of Hell: Eighth-century Britain to the Fifteenth Century. London.


  • Spiegel, H. (ed. and trans.) 1994. Marie de France: Fables. Toronto.


  • Return to main page
    This site © copyright 2003, A. G. Pluskowski